“I hate doing these yearly performance evaluations”
“What is it you hate so much?”
“They are no-where near accurate and often times I feel forced to use recent information to determine employee performance.”
“What would be better?” His eyes starred at the ceiling and I could tell the thought was there.
“More information that I could use”
“How can you get that information? How often do you meet with your staff?”
“We currently, thanks to your advice, have monthly coaching & feedback where we talk 1 on 1 about what is working well and what areas we can continue to focus on.”
“Could you gather performance data during those meetings"?”
Smiles across both of our faces “Yeah, I already am.”
“Do you have a process for doing that? In what way may we create a process for gathering performance data on a monthly basis?”
Below is a glimpse into the process we created:
Monthly by providing goals and coaching in shorter spans of time real-time feedback and performance improvement / department performance can be changed as needed and create a lasting productivity gain.
- In monthly coaching and feedback sessions 2 to 4 goals (what by when in a QQT/R format) will be established.
- 2 goals from the manager in-line with his longer time frame;
- 2 goals from the employee for personal development.
- Required updates (depending upon employees time-span management) usually via email or in weekly huddle meetings.
- In monthly coaching and feedback sessions prior months goals to be reviewed. Red, Green, Yellow light evaluation (plus further evidenced by the QQTR completion standards) for current standing on goals established.
- For exceptional performance, performance, and underperformance continued coaching, training, mentoring, development will be co-created by manager and employee.
Quarterly
- Quarterly reports created from the data collected monthly. These reports will show quantitative data (established from goals/tasks) that staff have direct control over.
- Quarterly reports created from data collected monthly. Showing qualitative data, based on expectation and capabilities that will yield managerial judgment of work.
- Shared metrics with staff showing data plus goals accomplished each quarter.
6 Months
- 2 times a year larger performance evaluations will be completed by the manager. Using the quarterly data gathered.
- Manager will use this data to determine trends in employee performance.
- Manager will use this data to determine trends in department performance.
- Manager’s Manager will use this data to determine effectiveness of the manager.
Yearly
- Yearly performance data will be supplied to CEO plus board members to show alignment on work and progress.
michael cardus is create-learning
image by d.billy
Do you hate the overwhelming push to complete performance evaluations once a year? Could your organization, team, leadership , you benefit from real-time data in a time-span that allows work to be improved and changed as needed? Contact Mike…to develop a process that makes teams and leaders more effective resulting in increased production and people who love the work they do.

Great list, with a vital point about shorter time frames. But I think there is one thing missing: 360-degree evaluations at least annually. Even with objective measures like you list, leaving the appraisal to one human being is necessarily going to introduce bias, at least subconsciously. In “The Extraordinary Leader,” two consultants with a solid background in scientific research reported zero correlation between 360 results and managerial ratings.
Great list that would help alleviate the stress of performance reviews. When working with my clients on workplace attitude, motivation, and leadership they often say that these types of reviews can be very more stressful for both the manager and employee. Breaking it down monthly would help. I’ve come across way too many organizations who are either unwilling or unable to involve their people when it comes to the important stuff.
@Jim…The problem with 360 for performance appraisal (as opposed to skill development and managerial leadership development) is twofold:1 it gathers opinions from which the informant cannot be held accountable, 2 it undermines the judgment of the persons manager.
@Alan
Great point the stress eats people alive and actually hurts the reviews. Monthly set upon actual goals that people are working on and completing allows for more real time feedback.
Thanks Mike, there’s so much literature on why traditional performance reviews suck and what to do about it. My favourite is the work done by Gunter Lueger in Vienna. Gunter not only developed a solution focused approach to reviews, he made it easy to apply becasue the review is about the reviewee’s resources for change, not the bosses prescription.
Love the format you developed.
Alan…you continually push me into knowing more or am I pulling you into telling me more?
Either way thank you and now I am going to think about using Solution Focused into a performance appraisal.